Keep In Touch

                        Email me!

Tuesday, 12 July 2011

Would You Like To Live Forever?



Immortality is a strange dream. Who wouldn't want more time to explore everything the world has to offer? But on the other hand, 'forever' is a very long time to contemplate.

The Immortality Virus by Christine Amsden considers the question of what might happen if everyone stopped ageing almost as soon as they reached adulthood. This has led to host of new problems for humanity: the world is heavily overpopulated, with the poor dying on the city streets every day, uncounted and uncared-for. Life in the countryside is hardly any better, with desperate people voluntarily entering into slave labour.

Against this backdrop, it's hardly surprising that some would prefer to see humanity return to a natural lifespan - although to speak such words in public is a death sentence since The Establishment, the men and women at the top of society, are enjoying their immortal life too much to want to let go. Their concerns are different. For them, one major risk to a long and happy life is from their children, who see no prospect of getting an inheritance. Ever.

The main character, Grace, is a blacklisted investigator who has somehow managed to remain an idealist throughout her one hundred and thirty years. She's a pleasant and believable woman, who's rather reluctant to get involved with the plot. Unfortunately, several people are threatening to kill her if she doesn't play along with their games.

Amsden gives us a supporting cast of characters who are plausible, if not always likeable, and an action-packed plot. As Grace tries to figure out how humanity became immortal in the first place, wishing to reverse it, there are plenty of others who'd prefer things to stay exactly as they are.

I found this an enjoyable read, with a well-developed concept. I'd definitely like to read more of Amsden's work.

Disclaimer: Twilight Times Books provided me with a free copy of The Immortality Virus for review purposes, but all opinions are my own.

8 comments:

Rachel said...

There's a short story called Melancholy Elephants, by Spider Robinson, which is related to the idea of this, but restricted to intellectual property. Another thought-provoking read.

becky said...

Thanks for sharing...looks like a good read for me...

Jenny Woolf said...

Sounds interesting. I've just been listening to the last series of Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy in which an immortal being gets so bored that he decides to make it his mission in life to personally insult everyone in the universe. I like Douglas Adams' treatment of the subject better than any other I've read!

Kimberly said...

Rachel, it is so nice to find you again. I had to change my blog, so I lost track people. My new blog is http://terradelsoledoro.blogspot.com

Anyway, have you read the latest that science has to offer...they are now actually growing body parts over plastic tubing from your own stem cells. Recently a gentleman had a windpipe regrown, and the body accepts the new organ since it is grown from stem cells from your won body.

I would love to live as long as I am able to really do for myself and engage in all the life has to offer.

Nice seeing you again. I have missed you!

Welshcakes Limoncello said...

It does sound interesting. As to the question, I don't think so!

Elizabeth Braun said...

Coming far away from the realms of fiction, but humans were actually *designed* to live forever (although not in immortality, there is, surprisingly, a difference). We use a small portion of our brains and most people don't really want to die, but to live with their loved ones without end. This is why so many cling to afterlife beliefs - they just can't bear the idea of non-existance. Understandably!

The important difference between the reality of our design and the picture given in the book here mentioned is that we weren't meant to live in the conditions we see around us today, but rather in peace, good health, universal plenty and complete security. The conditions being divinely induced would also mean that, contrary to any over-population, the gift of procreation would simply be removed when a reasonable limit had been reached.=)

So, my vote goes for this scenario and not for leaving things as they are - which for just too many millions is a grim and miserably short existence and, even for us who have it better, it still really isn't what we want.

LindyLouMac in Italy said...

This book certainly raises some interesting issues and for this reason I will add to my wishlist.

Scientific Housewife said...

Sounds very interesting!

Post a Comment

Thanks for dropping in! I'd love to hear what you have to say, and if you leave a URL, I'll be round to visit you soon.